ACTIVE SKY 16 NAVIGRAPH SOFTWARE
Where does the cooperation consist of?īut all this is annoying enough to remove these two software and put them in the archive. If now FSGRW fails with the correct input values, SkyMaxx does not seem to care. No matter what FSGRW delivers for weather, SkyMaxx should deliver this weather, including cloud image and nothing else. It makes me confused about how these two program developers present their cooperation between them.Īssuming ASXP actually deliver the correct value, SkyMaxx presents a cloud image that is more consistent with ASXP than with FSGRW. Your screenshot fits pretty well with what appears in my video. Previous cloud: BKN042, next cloud: None (Through extended weather data grid)Īlso there is no METAR for LFIL, or at least i can't find any so i think FSGRW is cheating on you, giving you some false METAR of LFIL? But that's pure speculation on my side. SCT008 extends to:3253 feet (Cloud type:ST, Turbulence:None, Icing:None, Shear:Gradual, Cloud shape:Flat). Previous cloud: BKN030, next cloud: SCT008 (Through metar) Previous cloud: None, next cloud: BKN042 (Through metar)īKN042 extends to:6276 feet (Cloud type:ST, Turbulence:Light, Icing:Trace, Shear:Gradual, Cloud shape:Flat). I didn't get any cloud layer at F元00 like your FSGRW did, see cloud info from ASXP when being 2nm off ENSAC 141424Z 31605KT 225V003 9999 BKN030 BKN042 SCT008 10/07 Q1021 RMK ADVANCED INTERPOLATIONīKN030 extends to:4209 feet (Cloud type:ST, Turbulence:Light, Icing:None, Shear:Gradual, Cloud shape:Flat). I did short test, just got airborne and positioned my aircraft to ENSAC fix with historical weather (i love this feature!) of today after 1400Z.